<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sanyo Katana II 6650 Black Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone</link>
	<description>The Perfect Spot to Shop Cell Phones Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan A. MacWade</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/comment-page-1#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan A. MacWade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone#comment-631</guid>
		<description>First of all, ignore my review of the Motorola V180 Quad-Band GSM Mobile Phone (Silver/Black) flip phone back in 2004.  I was way too kind, and the phone was terrible.  My Motorola bias was in full-swing.  In fact, I think I might be finished with Motorola.  The Motorola backlash is strong, and I finally agree with it.  Clunky user interfaces, poor speed, and poor battery life took their toll.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The Sanyo Katana II (2007) is a welcome hardware update to the original Katana (2004).  The Katana II is sleeker, more attractive, and resembles the flip phones that every Japanese manufacturer had in its home market five years ago (with external, customizable LCD displays).  It is built well, and has good buttons, except for super-thin volume rocker buttons next to the display.  Also, very important, it has excellent battery life.  The user interface is good for an entry-level phone.  But don&#039;t expect many customization options or the ability to upload pictures and ring tones onto the phone.  Apparently it cannot be done with either a USB cable or Bluetooth, whether phone-to-phone or PC-to-phone.  I wish I had known that before buying it.  It is not a deal-breaker for me, but for perhaps half the users out there, it is.  The USB cable available for this phone seems to be for charging only.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;My previous phone was a Motorola Q.  It was beyond bad.  Average battery life was a dismal 12 hours, requiring me to get an extra charger for my office.  The Katana II has excellent standby time.  The RAZR has been known to have a standby time of 6 or 7 days.  At the time of this review, I have gone 3 days without a recharge on the Katana.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The Katana II is designed to be a more affordable competitor to the RAZR.  It does almost everything the RAZR does, except sync with other devices.  Motorola phones might have clunky interfaces and short battery life, but they support SyncML, which allows them to sync with PCs and MACs running the right software (such as Apple&#039;s iSync).  The Katana is able to receive contacts from your old phone via Bluetooth, but after that, you are own your own for adding and editing new contacts.  At least Sprint offers their Wireless Backup service ($2 per month) that allows you to manage your contacts on the web.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The Katana has a pretty good default selection of alerts, ring tones, and volume controls.  They shouldn&#039;t have bothered with the camera, as it is as terrible as the RAZR or Q.  The camera is useless.  The Katana has decent memory, a limited calendar application (appointment titles are limited to 15 characters or so), and a decent WAP 2.0 browser (which is just as fast and capable as the awful version of Internet Explorer that came with the Motorola Q).  The web browser is restricted to mobile versions of major websites, such as NOAA weather, the BBC, Reuters, ESPN, Facebook, GMail, and iGoogle.  Pretty good for an entry-level phone.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Startup time (power-on and connect to CDMA network) is 10 seconds.  Shutdown time is 5 seconds.  I haven&#039;t seen a Motorola phone come close to that speed.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;So overall, the  Katana II is an attractive, well-made, thin flip phone with decent web capabilities and a simple, efficient interface.  But with the Sanyo mobile phone business being bought by Kyocera, I don&#039;t expect much support for this phone from the manufacturer.  The most support will come from Sprint and its Wireless Backup service.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, ignore my review of the Motorola V180 Quad-Band GSM Mobile Phone (Silver/Black) flip phone back in 2004.  I was way too kind, and the phone was terrible.  My Motorola bias was in full-swing.  In fact, I think I might be finished with Motorola.  The Motorola backlash is strong, and I finally agree with it.  Clunky user interfaces, poor speed, and poor battery life took their toll.</p>
<p>The Sanyo Katana II (2007) is a welcome hardware update to the original Katana (2004).  The Katana II is sleeker, more attractive, and resembles the flip phones that every Japanese manufacturer had in its home market five years ago (with external, customizable LCD displays).  It is built well, and has good buttons, except for super-thin volume rocker buttons next to the display.  Also, very important, it has excellent battery life.  The user interface is good for an entry-level phone.  But don&#8217;t expect many customization options or the ability to upload pictures and ring tones onto the phone.  Apparently it cannot be done with either a USB cable or Bluetooth, whether phone-to-phone or PC-to-phone.  I wish I had known that before buying it.  It is not a deal-breaker for me, but for perhaps half the users out there, it is.  The USB cable available for this phone seems to be for charging only.</p>
<p>My previous phone was a Motorola Q.  It was beyond bad.  Average battery life was a dismal 12 hours, requiring me to get an extra charger for my office.  The Katana II has excellent standby time.  The RAZR has been known to have a standby time of 6 or 7 days.  At the time of this review, I have gone 3 days without a recharge on the Katana.</p>
<p>The Katana II is designed to be a more affordable competitor to the RAZR.  It does almost everything the RAZR does, except sync with other devices.  Motorola phones might have clunky interfaces and short battery life, but they support SyncML, which allows them to sync with PCs and MACs running the right software (such as Apple&#8217;s iSync).  The Katana is able to receive contacts from your old phone via Bluetooth, but after that, you are own your own for adding and editing new contacts.  At least Sprint offers their Wireless Backup service ($2 per month) that allows you to manage your contacts on the web.</p>
<p>The Katana has a pretty good default selection of alerts, ring tones, and volume controls.  They shouldn&#8217;t have bothered with the camera, as it is as terrible as the RAZR or Q.  The camera is useless.  The Katana has decent memory, a limited calendar application (appointment titles are limited to 15 characters or so), and a decent WAP 2.0 browser (which is just as fast and capable as the awful version of Internet Explorer that came with the Motorola Q).  The web browser is restricted to mobile versions of major websites, such as NOAA weather, the BBC, Reuters, ESPN, Facebook, GMail, and iGoogle.  Pretty good for an entry-level phone.  </p>
<p>Startup time (power-on and connect to CDMA network) is 10 seconds.  Shutdown time is 5 seconds.  I haven&#8217;t seen a Motorola phone come close to that speed.  </p>
<p>So overall, the  Katana II is an attractive, well-made, thin flip phone with decent web capabilities and a simple, efficient interface.  But with the Sanyo mobile phone business being bought by Kyocera, I don&#8217;t expect much support for this phone from the manufacturer.  The most support will come from Sprint and its Wireless Backup service.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hwang</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/comment-page-1#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I love this phone.  It has a very high level of customization, down to the navigation keys and a &quot;quick menu&quot; where you can put anything from contacts, webpages, or control panel objects.  Schedule and alarms are intuitive and easy to use.  Volume buttons are a bit skinny, but at least they&#039;re long and tactile.  Camera is so-so, but can control settings manually.  The only thing I wish it had was a voice recording button, but I set that to a navigation key and that&#039;s almost as good.
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this phone.  It has a very high level of customization, down to the navigation keys and a &#8220;quick menu&#8221; where you can put anything from contacts, webpages, or control panel objects.  Schedule and alarms are intuitive and easy to use.  Volume buttons are a bit skinny, but at least they&#8217;re long and tactile.  Camera is so-so, but can control settings manually.  The only thing I wish it had was a voice recording button, but I set that to a navigation key and that&#8217;s almost as good.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>AT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone#comment-629</guid>
		<description>This is the best phone that I have owned. It was really important to me to find a phone with a low SAR rating (SAR, &#039;specific absorption rate&#039;, is an indication of the amount of radiation that is absorbed into a head while using a cellular phone, the higher the SAR rating the more radiation that is absorbed into the head). Motorola Razr phones typically have high SAR ratings (you can google your phone make and SAR online). Not only is the SAR for Katana II low, but it is also amazingly durable. I put my phone (by accident) through the washer for 30 minutes AND dryer for over 45 minutes and it still works perfectly (it took about a day to dry out)!!! I have also dropped it many times and it is fine (these things happen)! It is light weight and has great sound quality. I have no problems with the user interface. It is a great phone for someone who just wants a good quality, sleek phone, not a music player. The pictures it takes are of really reasonable quality. I am very very happy with my phone!
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best phone that I have owned. It was really important to me to find a phone with a low SAR rating (SAR, &#8216;specific absorption rate&#8217;, is an indication of the amount of radiation that is absorbed into a head while using a cellular phone, the higher the SAR rating the more radiation that is absorbed into the head). Motorola Razr phones typically have high SAR ratings (you can google your phone make and SAR online). Not only is the SAR for Katana II low, but it is also amazingly durable. I put my phone (by accident) through the washer for 30 minutes AND dryer for over 45 minutes and it still works perfectly (it took about a day to dry out)!!! I have also dropped it many times and it is fine (these things happen)! It is light weight and has great sound quality. I have no problems with the user interface. It is a great phone for someone who just wants a good quality, sleek phone, not a music player. The pictures it takes are of really reasonable quality. I am very very happy with my phone!<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mcginnis</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/comment-page-1#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mcginnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone#comment-628</guid>
		<description>The selection of features is, in general, nice, but poorly thought-out. For example, if you want to leave your phone turned on, but locked, you&#039;ll need to press a key sequence of at least 7 keys (more if you haven&#039;t set up a shortcut to take you to the security menu).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Lots of things about it are like that. It seems like the designers were given a list of features to include but that they didn&#039;t spend time figuring out how to make those features conveniently accessible.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;For a well-organized user interface, Nokia&#039;s the best I&#039;ve found.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The selection of features is, in general, nice, but poorly thought-out. For example, if you want to leave your phone turned on, but locked, you&#8217;ll need to press a key sequence of at least 7 keys (more if you haven&#8217;t set up a shortcut to take you to the security menu).</p>
<p>Lots of things about it are like that. It seems like the designers were given a list of features to include but that they didn&#8217;t spend time figuring out how to make those features conveniently accessible.</p>
<p>For a well-organized user interface, Nokia&#8217;s the best I&#8217;ve found.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Hinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Hinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobiles22.com/sanyo-katana-ii-6650-black-phone#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I recently got this phone after switching over to Sprint. The interface is boring and non-intuitive, and the buttons are difficult to press. I will be returning this phone, and do not recommend it for anyone. I switched over from an AT&amp;T/Samsung A707 &quot;Sync&quot; so it could be that the old phone spoiled me for all new phones... 
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got this phone after switching over to Sprint. The interface is boring and non-intuitive, and the buttons are difficult to press. I will be returning this phone, and do not recommend it for anyone. I switched over from an AT&#038;T/Samsung A707 &#8220;Sync&#8221; so it could be that the old phone spoiled me for all new phones&#8230;<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

